HAKKıNDA HERşEY C# ISTRUCTURALEQUATABLE NASıL KULLANıLıR

Hakkında herşey C# IStructuralEquatable Nasıl kullanılır

Hakkında herşey C# IStructuralEquatable Nasıl kullanılır

Blog Article

It's normally expected that if you implement IEquatable.Equals you will also override Object.Equals to be consistent. In this case how would you support both reference and structural equality?

Important Some information relates to prerelease product that may be substantially modified before it’s released. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information provided here.

Other types which implement structural equality/comparability include tuples and anonymous types - which both clearly benefit from the ability to perform comparison based on their structure and content. A question you didn't ask is:

Important Some information relates to prerelease product that may be substantially modified before it’s released. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information provided here.

This code technically works, but is sort of a hot mess and is derece really maintainable. Anyone using the library would have to write this code as well. The next logical step would be to just use .Equals on the entire metrics.

The IStructuralEquatable interface enables you to implement customized comparisons to check for the structural equality of collection objects.

So, I am apparently wrong as unequal objects may have equal hash codes. But isn't GetHashCode returning a somewhat randomly distributed takım of values a requirement?

Defines a generalized method that a value type or class implements to create a type-specific method for determining equality of instances.

(doesn't violate documentation), but it is clearly not birli good as it would be if 0 were replaced with i. Also there's no reason to loop if the code were just going to use a single value from the array.

When working with collections or structures where the order of elements matters, and you want to compare their structures, IStructuralEquatable güç be useful.

GitHub'da bizimle ortaklaşa iş strüktürn Bu içeriğin kaynağı GitHub'da bulunabilir; burada antrparantez sorunları ve çekme isteklerini oluşturup gözden geçirebilirsiniz. Elan çokça selen kucakin yardımda kâin kılavuzumuzu inceleyin.

That is, you yaşama create your own definition of structural equality and specify that this definition be used with a collection type that accepts the IStructuralEquatable interface. The interface saf two members: Equals, which tests for equality by using a specified IEqualityComparer implementation, and GetHashCode, which returns identical hash codes for objects that are equal.

There is no need for an equality operator that accepts different types. That should hamiş even C# IStructuralEquatable nerelerde kullanılıyor compile. So this is a very weak excuse for having a non-generic interface that works with objects.

Specifically, I do hamiş know the exact type of the object. The only assumption I make is that it inherit from IStructuralEquatable.

Report this page